hi guys
yes i have news
the fish that went through these tests is doing great but i have not had chance to change the subject fish over to the new subjects yet that i hope to do Sunday
regards the rest, im ashamed to say the guy from America and Sweden i banned from the site but they we More concerned with how they had been quoted and their sense and sensibilities than the whole bigger picture i am not concerned with how some one is quoted its the fact they were quoted that bothers me for instance John said i quoted him or misunderstood what he said fact is i never quoted him at all "period" i quoted the guy who came on here and quoted him said ! so it was a second hand quote. right or wrong that was m y point about quoting from other forums,
if they come back they will be dealt with the same way, sorry guys i have no time to dewal with your delicate nature , im waaaay to busy to chew the fat with the likes
regards paraformaldehyde i owe my chemist an apology i questioned hi s advise to me BIG , Nay HUGE massive mistake my apologies george , i had formaldehyde in the freezer for 1 month and no paraformaldehyde but would you believe on the day i wrote and questioned his info its changed? go figure with that i have the examples to show
first picture normal formaldehyde gin clear im sure you will agree

second picture side profile of formaldehyde turned bad AKA Paraformaldhyde

last picture formt he top showing larger paraformaldehyde precipitate at the bottom you cant see the finer stuff in the second picture because its outside the field of view of focus of the lense

if you see any of the second two dump the formaldehyde