given the results of this fascinating study, should this alter our opinion on the use of salt in our main ponds, say , an 'isotonic' level of 0.3%-0.6% to aid osmosis.
I have read & re-read various articles that argue for & against the inclusion of salt in koi ponds. the main argumant against is the possibility that it may hinder the use of various treatments.
if we accept that Formalin could now be removed from the list of affected treatments, would it be automatically safe to assume that MG&F would be okay with salt , and as (probably) the most commonly used pond treatment does this then push the salt/no salt argument further in favour of salt being used ?
i am going to have a fresh look at all the reasons for & against using salt to see what crops up, as i have always felt swayed towards YES, but have been put off by so many people telling me (or reading) to avoid it.
having done the calculation to give me a 0.3% = 1/2oz per gallon in my 5000g pond , i would need 2500 ounces, or 156lb which is 71kg of salt ! ... crikey , that's enough to put anyone off.
any thoughts on this anyone ?
Russell.